|
|
Take 5: Alexander Payne
MOVIEFONE /
2004
Alexander Payne's independent films have a way of making us wince at painfully
familiar scenarios, embarrassing situations we can all identify with. Just
think of the moment in 'About Schmidt' when a newly retired Jack Nicholson
drops by the office, just to make sure the old team doesn't need him for
anything. Or the heartbreaking sense of failure that would drive a teacher
(Matthew Broderick) so irritated by his know-it-all student (Reese Witherspoon)
to convince a classmate to run against her in 'Election.' In Payne's latest
movie, 'Sideways,' the observations cut deeper than usual, and yet the net
effect is a movie that leaves you feeling surprisingly satisfied about everything
life has to offer. Where does Payne's distinctive outlook come from? Here
the 'Sideways' director names five films that taught him how to look at movies
-- and life -- differently.
Seven Samurai
(1954, dir: Akira Kurosawa; starring: Takashi Shimura, Toshiro
Mifune)
What happens to me is I fall in love with certain films and then I see them
any time I know they're being projected, so that's an important criterion
for me, which is how often I want to see a film projected. I've probably
seen 'Seven Samurai' 45 times. I mean, I could basically tell it to you shot
by shot. I first saw it upon its rerelease at the Castro Theater in the spring
of '82. I was deciding whether for graduate school I was going to go into
journalism or film, and I just remember thinking, "Wow, I will never make
a film that good. I couldn't ever climb a mountain that high, but wouldn't
it be interesting to at least walk along some of the paths at the base of
the mountain?" You have to start somewhere, and [Kurosawa's early films]
are all quite intimate stories. Lean didn't come out of the box making 'Bridge
on the River Kwai.' [The realization] that film can do that was just astonishing
to me. As a history student, to see history lived in that film and to be
transported so fully to that early 17th century Japan was a revelation.
Viridiana
(1961, dir: Luis Buñuel; starring: Silvia Pinal, Francisco
Rabal)
Another film that made an impression on me in terms of its ferocity was Bunuel's
'Viridiana.' After years and years [in exile], Buñuel was allowed
to return to Spain under Franco. He was able to make one film, and it's the
biggest "F--- you, Franco" film that you can think of, so much so that Franco
tried to have it banned. 'Viridiana' is a very rigorous and uncompromising
film, and it's really a font of inspiration for me. The story is about a
girl in a convent who is convinced to come live with her uncle, because her
uncle is a landowner, a "latifondista." This girl, Viridiana, reminds him
so desperately of his beloved dead wife that he begins to fetishize young
Viridiana. He even convinces Viridiana that he's raped her so she will stay,
thinking that she's been disgraced and can't return to the convent. She then
decides to continue God's work there and wants to turn this big estate into
a refuge for the local poor, [which leads to] this famous scene of the beggars'
banquet, where the owners leave the estate and all these homeless people
take over the dining room and smash and destroy everything.
Modern Times & City Lights
(1936 & 1931, dir: Charlie Chaplin; starring: Charlie Chaplin)
I want to put two films together that I personally return to over and over
in my life and always get satisfaction from, which are 'City Lights' and
'Modern Times.' I've seen them since I was a kid, and I've found that I've
never outgrown them, and I even grow into new aspects of them. As a whole,
I prefer 'Modern Times,' but 'City Lights' has the greatest ending ever in
a film, and I think it's a great achievement, not just in film, but in any
of the arts. The feeling that you get from the ending of 'City Lights' is
so pure and so profound and so simple. I'm basically influenced by silent
comedy. As a kid, I spent my early years watching silent comedy. I'm a huge
fan of Chaplin and Keaton, Harold Lloyd and what Hal Roach and Mack Sennett
were doing. Among the things I'm interested in in film is physical humor,
how characters move in space and constructing gags, though I do it in my
own way. 'Sideways' has one shot I'm very proud of, which is that naked guy
running out at Miles. The timing on that shot and the way it's constructed
with foreground and background is really quite good, I think.
The Wild Bunch
(1969; dir: Sam Peckinpah; starring: William Holden, Ernest
Borgnine)
'The Wild Bunch' is so unlike any other film made ever -- how it's shot,
how it's edited, how it's cast. One thing that's awful about the age in which
we live, where all of our actors are basically boys and girls, is that we
don't really have men actors. If you were to go make 'The Wild Bunch' today,
who would be in it? Where is Robert Ryan, Strother Martin, William Holden,
Ernest Borgnine or L.Q. Jones? The thing that I like most about 'The Wild
Bunch' is its mystery. There's something infinitely elusive and ungraspable
about it -- what it's about, why those people do what they do, why Peckinpah
made the film. It's such an accomplished film, it's as though it comes straight
from God somehow, but why? That's when cinema is beautiful, when you feel
you understand it, but you can't put it into words because it exists only
in the language of cinema. Maybe you could begin to describe it, but like
a translation, what you say will never actually be it. If you haven't seen
'The Wild Bunch,' you have to stop reading this stupid interview with me
and go see it right away because anything I have to say just pales in comparison
to watching 'The Wild Bunch.'
The Leopard
(1963; dir: Luchino Visconti; starring: Burt Lancaster, Alain Delon)
I'll tell you a film that's inspired me recently is 'The Leopard.' I've only
seen it once, and I couldn't believe how good that film was. You have to
have some life experience and also some knowledge of history to really get
what Visconti's doing: To take on as a subject the realization of the passing
of one era to another and the acceptance of that passing even though it means
your own death is so interesting and so beautiful. [He accomplishes that
transition through a long] ballroom sequence that reminds me of Antonioni's
'La Notte,' where you see the passage in the lives of the characters over
the course of one night, and precisely at a party. In 'The Leopard,' it's
like a dance of death or a wake. The grace of Burt Lancaster in that film,
the catlike elegance with which he moves across the frame and the world-weariness
with which he accepts what's happening and realizes that we must change for
things to stay the same. And the beauty of the final shot, as he disappears
into the shadows and a little pussycat comes out on the sidewalk -- the Leopard
has become a little pussycat. He who will most suffer by the passing is the
one who must accept it, that's what I found most beautiful.
|
|
|
|